Steven:
Maybe more than any other guitarist ever, youre inextricably linked to the Gibson SG? What was the evolution that brought you to this particular instrument?

Angus:
I started playing on banjos and re-strung them up with six strings. [But] an acoustic guitar, an old bang up little ten-dollar job, that was probably the first thing I started playing on. Me brother Malcolm got a Hofner off of one of me other brothers and he got a Gretsch and passed the Hofner on to me after much squabbling.

It was semi-acoustic and had all been packed with cotton. But I never used to really take it as a serious thing; I just used to fool around with it. When I was about 14 was when I really started playing it seriously. I got an amplifier for about sixty bucks that used to distort all the time. It was a Phi-Sonic. After that I got out and got a Gibson SG that I played until it got wood rot because so much sweat and water got into it. The whole neck warped. I bought it second-hand, it was about a 67. It had a real thin neck, really slim, like a Custom neck. It was dark brown. After about a year, you lose about half the power in the pickups so you either get them re-wired or put new ones in. Just ordinary Gibsons.

Steven:
Did these early instruments still have that tremolo arm attached?

Angus:
They did but I took it off. I used to fool around with them but you begin sounding like Hank Marvin.

Steven:
And why did you remain loyal to the Gibson SG for the remainder of your career?

Angus:
It was light [weight-wise]. Id tried the other ones, Fenders, but youve really got to do a number on em. Theyre great for feel but the wiring just doesnt got the balls. And I dont like putting those DiMarzios and everything because everyone sounds the same. All the other sort of Gibsons I tried like the Les Paul was too heavy. Hip displacement.

When I first started playing with the SG there was nothing to think about. I dont know how this came about but I think I had a lot thinner neck. Someone once said to me they [Gibson] make two sized necks, one was 1 and one was 1 and this was like 1 , thin all the way up. Even now I still look all over and I still havent found one; Ive been to a hundred guitar shops and I found the same guitar [model] but with different necks.

Steven:
Did you ever experiment with the Gibson SGs when they were called Les Pauls [Eric Claptons graphically appointed Cream-era guitar is probably the most famous representative of this model]?

Angus:
Yeah, I had a really old one I bought, a 1962. But it had a very fat neck; it was good to play but it felt heavier than all the other ones. Thats why I stopped using it. And when youre running around a lot, it weighs you down.

Steven:
So from High Voltage on its always been the SG. Have you ever tried using more modern types of instruments?

Angus:
Yeah, I tried a Hamer but I wouldnt buy an expensive guitar especially in my case. Its always getting beaten around. With the SG, you can do plenty of tricks with them.

Steven:
And youve been faithful to Marshall amplifiers as well?

Angus:
Ever since Ive been in this band Ive been using Marshalls. Ive tried Ampeg and they werent too good for the sound I wanted.

On stage I have four stacks going, all hooked up with splitter boxes. 100-watt stacks its good for your eardrums. I use a real lot of volume, I turn that up; I turn the treble and bass on about half and middle, the same. I dont use any presence. If I dont think its putting out enough top, I will kick up the presence.

With Marshalls, if youre using a fair bit of volume, if you whack the treble and bass at half, thats where theyre working. We get them from the factory, thats what we do. We go down there and try them out and fool around with amps and tell them what we want and they doctor them up. At the moment, theyre all back to the old style of Marshalls, theyre very clean. They dont have these master or preamp settings.

Steven:
You have entered the modern age of electronics in your use of a wireless system.

Angus:
Yeah, I use the Schaffer-Vega. Ive been using that since 77. On the receiver youve got like a monitor switch you can boost the signal and in the transmitter youve got the same sort of thing. You can really give a guitar hell with em. I have used the remote in the studio and it worked really good. I dont believe Ive ever had a wah-wah or a fuzz box. Its just the guitar and the amp and if I need anything, if someone says they want a different approach to the sound, then Ill get it with the guitar.